Government's plans to disconnect illegal downloaders are justifiable, say MPs

Plans to disconnect internet pirates justifiable say MPs

Controversial measures to reduce illegal downloading have been reviewed by a committee of MPs and found to be 'justifiable' this week, despite complaints from campaigners and ISPs.

The government's Digital Economy bill has made the headlines over its proposed measures for dealing with so-called internet pirates by first forcing ISPs to send a warning letter, and then disconnecting repeat offenders. Both ISPs and consumer rights groups have opposed the measures, pointing out that ISPs should not be required to police online behaviour, and that  tracking the IP address responsible for illegal downloads does not necessarily locate the user responsible.

However, the Parliamentary Select Committee on Human Rights has reviewed the plans and not only found them to be justifiable, but agreed that the government should be making more decisive moves to protect creators' rights; although it has admitted that more information is required. The committee has asked for both a better explanation of the rules, in particular exactly what constitutes a repeat offender; and has asked Ofcom to review the technical side of things.

"It is unlikely that the operation of these proposals alone will lead to a significant risk of a breach of individual internet users' right to respect for privacy, their right to freedom of expression or their right to respect for their property rights," the committee's report says, going on to add: "The limited impact on these rights by the operation of the copyright infringement reporting mechanism proposed is likely to be justifiable."

 

Like this? Please share it!

Like Broadband Genie?




Comments

  • unhappy

    by Jonathan Hartley at 18:37 on 8 Feb 2010Report abuse

    If the measures are justifiable, could we see the justifications please?

    Self-reported 'losses' by special interest groups don't count. Evidence-based please!

  • unhappy

    by mark at 21:56 on 8 Feb 2010 | registered | 1 postReport abuse

    A typical naive response to an ill thought out proposal.
    Parents and people sharing accomodation have no chance of monitoring, policing and protecting their internet.
    An IP address is not proof of guilt, but what else will authorities use.
    What redress is there for wrongful accusation?
    Again another unnecessary tax foisted on the public sponsored by an industry resistant to change. The problam of breach of copyright is a business problem brought about by high prices and a lack of imagination.
    Internet access is a fundamental right and I would recommend anyone who cares about freedom withdraw their support from both the Conservatives and the Labour party.

Add your comment now

Post a reply to this thread

 

 

Please describe your emotions in making this comment:


Powered by reCAPTCHA

Unless you are a verified user, comments will be moderated before they appear. Comments submitted entirely in capital letters, containing advertising or excessive swearing will be rejected; please try to be polite. The best comments are relevant, factual and balanced; think about all aspects of the package, such as speed, connection quality and customer service. We reserve the right to edit comments.