UK government could be taken to court over BT Phorm trials

phorm logoThere were developments concerning the Government's role in the Phorm trials this week as the European Commission publicly accused it of failing to protect citizen’s privacy back in 2006.

Back in April 2009 Broadband Genie reported the UK government could be sued for its lack of action against the trials. The Commission has now confirmed it’s in its second phase of legal action and, if the UK fails to answer back to the criticism satisfactorily it could face a battle in the European court. Here, there is a chance a change in UK law could be enforced.

Speaking on the decision, Viviane Reding, EU telecoms commissioner commented: “People’s privacy and the integrity of their personal data in the digital work is not only an important matter, it is a fundamental right protected by European law.”

The UK Government always maintained it was happy with the way the Phorm trial was implemented however, critics of the ad-serving system say it wasn’t fair on a number of BT broadband customers who were enrolled into the trials without being given the chance to opt out.

The Commission has now sent a letter detailing its opinion to the UK and the Government has two months to reply with a satisfactory answer.

Responding to the latest development in the Phorm case a Home Office spokesperson commented: “We are firmly committed to protecting users’ privacy and data. We are considering the Commission’s letter and will respond in due course.”

To read up on archived Phorm news and learn more about the details surrounding this case click here.

Like this? Please share it!

Like Broadband Genie?




Comments

  • unhappy

    by Pete at 00:33 on 18 Mar 2010Report abuse

    It also wasn't fair on the businesses and organisations that expected British Telecom to respect the confidentiality/integrity/security of UK telecommunications.

    It wasn't fair on the people who's communications were covertly copied processed and sold to their competitors as 'marketing intelligence'.

    It was fraud, copyright theft, illegal interception, computer misuse... and two years on the people responsible for it should be in a prison cell.

    No ifs, no buts, the people who did it were criminals.

Add your comment now

Post a reply to this thread

 

 

Please describe your emotions in making this comment:


Powered by reCAPTCHA

Unless you are a verified user, comments will be moderated before they appear. Comments submitted entirely in capital letters, containing advertising or excessive swearing will be rejected; please try to be polite. The best comments are relevant, factual and balanced; think about all aspects of the package, such as speed, connection quality and customer service. We reserve the right to edit comments.